Effectiveness of G-CSF in chemotherapy for digestive system tumors: a systematic review of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 delineated by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reportedly reduces the risk of neutropenia and subsequent infections caused by cancer chemotherapy. Although several guidelines recommend using G-CSF in primary prophylaxis according to the incidence rate of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN), the effectiveness of G-CSF in digestive system tumor chemotherapy remains unclear. To address these clinical questions, we conducted a systematic review as part of revising the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 published by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology. METHODS: This systematic review addressed two main clinical questions (CQ): CQ1: "Is primary prophylaxis with G-CSF effective in chemotherapy?", and CQ2: "Is increasing the intensity of chemotherapy with G-CSF effective?" We reviewed different types of digestive system tumors, including esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, biliary tract, colorectal, and neuroendocrine carcinomas. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases were searched for information sources. Independent systematic reviewers conducted two rounds of screening and selected relevant records for each CQ. Finally, the working group members synthesized the strength of evidence and recommendations. RESULTS: After two rounds of screening, 5/0/3/0/2/0 records were extracted for CQ1 of esophageal/gastric/pancreatic/biliary tract/colorectal/ and neuroendocrine carcinoma, respectively. Additionally, a total of 2/6/1 records were extracted for CQ2 of esophageal/pancreatic/colorectal cancer, respectively. The strength of evidence and recommendations were evaluated for CQ1 of colorectal cancer; however, we could not synthesize recommendations for other CQs owing to the lack of records. CONCLUSION: The use of G-CSF for primary prophylaxis in chemotherapy for colorectal cancer is inappropriate.

Comparison between a single dose of PEG G-CSF and multiple doses of non-PEG G-CSF: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

BACKGROUD: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used for the primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN). Two types of G-CSF are available in Japan, namely G-CSF chemically bound to polyethylene glycol (PEG G-CSF), which provides long-lasting effects with a single dose, and non-polyethylene glycol-bound G-CSF (non-PEG G-CSF), which must be sequentially administrated for several days. METHODS: This current study investigated the utility of these treatments for the primary prophylaxis of FN through a systematic review of the literature. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis or meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate six outcomes. RESULTS: Through the first and second screenings, 23 and 18 articles were extracted for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, respectively. The incidence of FN was significantly lower in the PEG G-CSF group than in the non-PEG G-CSF group with a strong quality/certainty of evidence. The differences in other outcomes, such as overall survival, infection-related mortality, the duration of neutropenia (less than 500/µL), quality of life, and pain, were not apparent. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of PEG G-CSF is strongly recommended over multiple-dose non-PEG G-CSF therapy for the primary prophylaxis of FN.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF after induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan society of clinical oncology.

Although granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the incidence, duration, and severity of neutropenia, its prophylactic use for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial due to a theoretically increased risk of relapse. The present study investigated the effects of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis for AML with remission induction therapy. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis of pooled data was conducted, and the risk ratio with corresponding confidence intervals was calculated in the meta-analysis and summarized. Sixteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis, nine of which were examined in the meta-analysis. Although G-CSF significantly shortened the duration of neutropenia, primary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not correlate with infection-related mortality. Moreover, primary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not affect disease progression/recurrence, overall survival, or adverse events, such as musculoskeletal pain. However, evidence to support or discourage the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis for adult AML patients with induction therapy remains limited. Therefore, the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis can be considered for adult AML patients with remission induction therapy who are at a high risk of infectious complications.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during dose-dense chemotherapy for urothelial cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) decreases the incidence, duration, and severity of febrile neutropenia (FN); however, dose reduction or withdrawal is often preferred in the management of adverse events in the treatment of urothelial cancer. It is also important to maintain therapeutic intensity in order to control disease progression and thereby relieve symptoms, such as hematuria, infection, bleeding, and pain, as well as to prolong the survival. In this clinical question, we compared treatment with primary prophylactic administration of G-CSF to maintain therapeutic intensity with conventional standard therapy without G-CSF and examined the benefits and risks as major outcomes. A detailed literature search for relevant studies was performed using PubMed, Ichu-shi Web, and Cochrane Library. Data were extracted and evaluated independently by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis of the pooled data was performed, and the risk ratios with corresponding confidence intervals were calculated and summarized in a meta-analysis. Seven studies were included in the qualitative analysis, two of which were reviewed in the meta-analysis of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) therapy, and one randomized controlled study showed a reduction in the incidence of FN. Primary prophylactic administration of G-CSF may be beneficial, as shown in a randomized controlled study of dose-dense MVAC therapy. However, there are no studies on other regimens, and we made a "weak recommendation to perform" with an annotation of the relevant regimen (dose-dense MVAC).

Optimal timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF after chemotherapy administration for patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

INTRODUCTION: The timing of prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration during cancer chemotherapy varies, with Day 2 and Days 3-5 being the most common schedules. Optimal timing remains uncertain, affecting efficacy and adverse events. This systematic review sought to evaluate the available evidence on the timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF administration. METHODS: Based on the Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development, we searched the PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and Cochrane Library databases for literature published from January 1990 to December 2019. The inclusion criteria included studies among the adult population using pegfilgrastim. The search strategy focused on timing-related keywords. Two reviewers independently extracted and assessed the data. RESULTS: Among 300 initial search results, only four articles met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis for febrile neutropenia incidence suggested a potential higher incidence when pegylated G-CSF was administered on Days 3-5 than on Day 2 (odds ratio: 1.27, 95% CI 0.66-2.46, p = 0.47), with a moderate certainty of evidence. No significant difference in overall survival or mortality due to infections was observed. The trend of severe adverse events was lower on Days 3-5, without statistical significance (odds ratio: 0.72, 95% CI 0.14-3.67, p = 0.69) and with a moderate certainty of evidence. Data on pain were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Both Day 2 and Days 3-5 were weakly recommended for pegylated G-CSF administration post-chemotherapy in patients with cancer. The limited evidence highlights the need for further research to refine recommendations.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of G-CSF during chemotherapy for prostate cancer, Japanese clinical guideline for appropriate use of G-CSF: clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (DTX) is commonly used as a primary chemotherapy, and cabazitaxel (CBZ) has shown efficacy in patients who are DTX resistant. Primary prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy is currently used with CBZ treatment in routine clinical care in Japan. METHODS: In this study, we performed a systematic review following the Minds guidelines to investigate the effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during chemotherapy for prostate cancer and to construct G-CSF guidelines for primary prophylaxis use during chemotherapy. A comprehensive literature search of various electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi) was performed on January 10, 2020, to identify studies published between January 1990 and December 31, 2019 that investigate the impact of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during CBZ administration on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Ultimately, nine articles were included in the qualitative systematic review. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis during CBZ administration for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was difficult to assess in terms of correlation with overall survival, mortality from infection, and patients' quality of life. These difficulties were owing to the lack of randomized controlled trials comparing patients with and without primary prophylaxis of G-CSF during CBZ administration. However, some retrospective studies have suggested that it may reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: G-CSF may be beneficial as primary prophylaxis during CBZ administration for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, and we made a "weak recommendation to perform" with an annotation of the relevant regimen.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis to develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly administered to cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy, especially when incidence rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) surpasses 20%. While primary prophylaxis with G-CSF has been proven effective in preventing FN in patients with cancer, there is limited evidence regarding its efficacy in specifically, lung cancer. Our systematic review focused on the efficacy of G-CSF primary prophylaxis in lung cancer. METHODS: We extracted studies on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) using the PubMed, Ichushi Web, and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers assessed the extracted studies for each type of lung cancer and conducted quantitative and meta-analyses of preplanned outcomes, including overall survival, FN incidence, infection-related mortality, quality of life, and musculoskeletal pain. RESULTS: A limited number of studies were extracted: two on NSCLC and six on SCLC. A meta-analysis was not conducted owing to insufficient data on NSCLC. Two case-control studies explored the efficacy of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF in patients with NSCLC (on docetaxel and ramucirumab therapy) and indicated a lower FN frequency with G-CSF. For SCLC, meta-analysis of five studies showed no significant reduction in FN incidence, with an odds ratio of 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.03-5.56, P = 0.48). Outcomes other than FN incidence could not be evaluated due to low data availability. CONCLUSION: Limited data are available on G-CSF prophylaxis in lung cancer. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF may be weakly recommended in Japanese patients with NSCLC undergoing docetaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy.

Clinical impact and characteristics of erythroid dysplasia in adult aplastic anaemia: Results from a multicentre registry.

Morphological dysplasia in haematopoietic cells, defined by a 10% threshold in each lineage, is one of the diagnostic criteria for myelodysplastic neoplasms. Dysplasia limited to the erythroid lineage has also been reported in some cases of aplastic anaemia (AA); however, its significance remains unclear. We herein examined the impact of erythroid dysplasia on immunosuppressive therapy responses and survival in AA patients. The present study included 100 eligible AA patients without ring sideroblasts. Among them, 32 had dysplasia in the erythroid lineage (AA with minimal dysplasia [mini-D]). No significant sex or age differences were observed between AA groups with and without erythroid dysplasia. In severe/very severe AA and non-severe AA patients, a response to anti-thymocyte globulin + ciclosporin within 12 months was observed in 80.0% and 60.0% of AA with mini-D and 42.9% and 90.0% of those without dysplasia, with no significant difference (p = 0.29 and p = 0.24 respectively). Overall survival and leukaemia-free survival did not significantly differ between the groups. Collectively, the present results indicate that the presence of erythroid dysplasia did not significantly affect clinical characteristics or outcomes in AA patients, suggesting that its presence in AA is acceptable. Therefore, erythroid dysplasia should not exclude an AA diagnosis.

A case of hepatitis-associated aplastic anaemia following living-donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatitis showing loss of heterozygosity in the 6p chromosome in the affected liver.

The mechanisms underlying hepatitis-associated aplastic anaemia (HAAA) that occurs several weeks after the development of acute hepatitis are unknown. A 20-year-old male developed HAAA following living-donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatitis. The patient's leucocytes lacked HLA-class I due to loss of heterozygosity in the short arm of chromosome 6p (6pLOH). Interestingly, the patient's liver cells resected during the transplantation also exhibited 6pLOH that affected the same HLA haplotype as the leucocytes, suggesting that CD8+ T cells recognizing antigens presented by specific HLA molecules on liver cells may have attacked the haematopoietic stem cells of the patient, leading to the HAAA development.

HLA Class I Allele Loss and Bone Marrow Transplantation Outcomes in Immune Aplastic Anemia.

In patients with immune-mediated acquired aplastic anemia (AA), HLA class I alleles often disappear from the surface of hematopoietic progenitor cells, potentially enabling evasion from cytotoxic T lymphocyte-mediated pathogenesis. Although HLA class I allele loss has been studied in AA patients treated with immunosuppressive therapy (IST), its impact on allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) has not been thoroughly investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical implications of HLA class I allele loss in patients with acquired AA undergoing allogeneic BMT. The study enrolled acquired AA patients who underwent initial BMT from unrelated donors through the Japan Marrow Donor Program between 1993 and 2011. The presence of HLA class I allele loss due to loss of heterozygosity (HLA-LOH) was assessed using pretransplantation blood DNA and correlated with clinical data obtained from the Japanese Transplant Registry Unified Management Program. A total of 432 patients with acquired AA were included in the study, and HLA-LOH was detected in 20 of the 178 patients (11%) available for analysis. Patients with HLA-LOH typically presented with more severe AA at diagnosis (P = .017) and underwent BMT earlier (P < .0001) compared to those without HLA-LOH. They also showed a slight but significant recovery in platelet count from the time of diagnosis to BMT (P = .00085). However, HLA-LOH status had no significant effect on survival, engraftment, graft failure, chimerism status, graft-versus-host disease, or other complications following BMT, even when the 20 HLA-LOH+ patients were compared with the 40 propensity score-matched HLA-LOH- patients. Nevertheless, patients lacking HLA-A*02:06 or HLA-B*40:02, the alleles most frequently lost and associated with a better IST response, showed higher survival rates compared to those lacking other alleles, with estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 100% and 44%, respectively (P = .0042). In addition, in a specific subset of HLA-LOH- patients showing clinical features similar to HLA-LOH+ patients, the HLA-A*02:06 and HLA-B*40:02 allele genotypes correlated with better survival rates compared with other allele genotypes, with estimated 5-year OS rates of 100% and 43%, respectively (P = .0096). However, this genotype correlation did not extend to all patients, suggesting that immunopathogenic mechanisms linked to the loss of certain HLA alleles, rather than the HLA genotypes themselves, influence survival outcomes. The survival benefit associated with the loss of these two alleles was confirmed in a multivariable Cox regression model. The observed correlations between HLA loss and the pretransplantation clinical manifestations and between loss of specific HLA class I alleles and survival outcomes in AA patients may improve patient selection for unrelated BMT and facilitate further investigations into the immune pathophysiology of the disease.

A longitudinal analysis of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria-type cells in patients with bone marrow failure: Results of a prospective multi-centre study in Japan.

To determine the prevalence and clinical relevance of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein-deficient (GPI[-]) cell populations (paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria [PNH]-type cells) in patients with acquired aplastic anaemia (AA) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we prospectively studied peripheral blood samples of 2402 patients (1075 with AA, 900 with MDS, 144 with PNH, and 283 with other anaemia) using a high-sensitivity flow cytometry assay in a nationwide multi-centre observational study. PNH-type cells were detected in 52.6% of AA and 13.7% of MDS patients. None of the 35 patients with refractory anaemia (RA) with ringed sideroblasts or the 86 patients with RA with excess of blasts carried PNH-type cells. Among the 317 patients possessing PNH-type granulocytes, the percentage of PNH-type granulocytes increased by ≥10% in 47 patients (14.8%), remained unchanged in 240 patients (75.7%), and decreased by ≥10% in 30 patients (9.5%) during 3 years of follow-up. PNH-type granulocyte expansion occurred more frequently (27.1%) in the 144 patients who originally carried PNH-type granulocytes ≥1% than in the 173 patients with PNH-type granulocytes <1% (4.6%). This study confirmed that PNH-type cells are undetectable in authentic clonal MDS patients, and the presence of ≥1% PNH-type granulocytes predicts a higher likelihood of PNH-type cell expansion than with <1% PNH-type granulocytes.

Familial immune-mediated aplastic anaemia in six different families.

We studied the pathophysiology of aplastic anaemia (AA) in six different pairs of relatives without a family history of hematologic disorders or congenital AA. Five and four of the six pairs shared the HLA-DRB1*15:01 and B*40:02 alleles, respectively. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein-deficient blood cells were detected in eight of the 10 patients evaluated. In a mother-daughter pair from one family, flow cytometry detected leukocytes lacking HLA-A2 due to loss of heterogeneity in chromosome 6p. Whole-exome sequencing of the family pair revealed a missense mutation in MYSM1. These results suggest that genetic inheritance of immune traits might underlie familial AA in some patients.

Intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and bortezomib for PBSC mobilization in multiple myeloma.

Although the incorporation of bortezomib into induction regimens has improved response rates in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), the role of bortezomib in the peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization remains unclear. We assessed the PBSC mobilization efficacy, safety, and disease response of intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and bortezomib in the PBSC mobilization. Twenty-one patients with newly diagnosed MM were enrolled in a phase II, non-randomized study that used bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2/day on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) and intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2/day on days 2, 3) (Bor-ID-CY). The data from 15 patients who received intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (ID-CY) were used as a historical control group. The total CD34 + cell yield of Bor-ID-CY and ID-CY groups were not significantly different (median 6.3 ×106/kg vs. 6.5 ×106/kg, p = 0.26). All three patients with mobilization failure of two groups had t(11;14). Six patients in Bor-ID-CY group were upgraded from a status that was less than a very good partial response (VGPR) at the time of PBSC mobilization to a VGPR or better after PBSC mobilization (p = 0.014). Four patients in Bor-ID-CY group developed sepsis. The time to engraftment was similar in the two groups. The addition of bortezomib to ID-CY did not impact the stem cell yield or quality.

[Japanese patient preferences between ravulizumab and eculizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria].

Ravulizumab is the first long-acting complement inhibitor approved for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) treatment. We evaluated patient preference for ravulizumab or eculizumab among Japanese adults with PNH. The ALXN1210-PNH-301 (NCT02946463) and ALXN1210-PNH-302 (NCT03056040) studies included 23 Japanese adults who are enrolled in complement inhibitor treatment-naive and eculizumab (≥6 months) treatment. Patient preference was assessed using the PNH-specific patient preference questionnaire (PNH-PPQ©). Most patients preferred ravulizumab (19/23, 82.6%), none preferred eculizumab, and four (17.4%) reported no preference (χ2 test, p<0.005). The preference for ravulizumab was driven by its lower infusion frequency (every 8 weeks) compared with eculizumab (every 2 weeks). The included Japanese patients with PNH preferred ravulizumab because of its reduced infusion frequency, which increases activity planning ability, treatment convenience, and overall quality of life, as compared with eculizumab. These data provide useful insight into patient perspectives and may aid decision-making for PNH treatment.

Eight-color multiparameter flow cytometry (EuroFlow-NGF) is as sensitive as next-generation sequencing in detecting minimal/measurable residual disease in autografts of patients with multiple myeloma.

The prognostic value of minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) detection in autografts of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in an autologous stem-cell transplantation setting has been reported. Next-generation flow (NGF) cytometry has lower sensitivity (2 × 10-6) to detect MRD than next-generation sequencing (NGS) (<10-6). We compared the clinical value of high-sensitivity NGF (cutoff: <10-6) and NGS (cutoff: 10-6) for the detection of MRD in the cryopreserved autografts of 49 patients with newly diagnosed MM. The sensitivity test using frozen/thawed autografts revealed a strong correlation among MRD levels of 5 × 10-7 and 1 × 10-4 (r = 0.9997, p < 0.0001) when an adequate number of cells were analyzed. Autograft MRD levels determined using NGF and NGS were highly correlated (r = 0.811, p < 0.0001). MRD-negative patients identified with NGF (cutoff: <10-6) showed significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than MRD-positive patients (p = 0.026). The PFS of MRD-negative patients determined by NGS (cutoff: 10-6) was similar to that determined by NGF. These results show that the high-sensitivity NGF method can assess MRD in frozen/thawed autografts, and its prognostic value is comparable to that of NGS.

Decision analysis of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation versus immunosuppressive therapy for young adult patients with aplastic anemia.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from an HLA-matched sibling donor is recommended as an initial treatment for young patients. However, immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with cyclosporine and anti-thymocyte globulin may be a viable option even when an HLA-identical sibling donor is available. METHODS: We constructed a Markov model to simulate the 10-year clinical course of patients aged 21-40 years with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia. Immediate BMT and IST were compared as an initial treatment assuming the availability of an HLA-identical sibling donor. Transition probabilities after treatment were determined based on a registry data analysis for BMT and a long-term prospective study for IST. RESULTS: Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) after treatment selection were 6.77 for BMT and 6.74 for IST. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the utility for being alive without GVHD after BMT, that for being alive with partial response after IST, and the response rate after initial IST strongly affected the results. CONCLUSIONS: BMT and IST produced similar QALY for young patients with severe aplastic anemia. An estimation of the response rate to the initial IST may enable an individualized comparison between BMT and IST.